There's a lot of hay being made over whether we should drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve. Republicans seem to think that it is the solution to energy independence and will bring about cheaper gas. Democrats, well, they seem to be vaguely against drilling. I was astonished to see this graph, which gives you an idea of the scale of the whole thing:
I post this not to encourage or decry drilling in ANWR, just to show the scope of what the discussion is about. At it's peak, ANWR might produce the equivalent of 3% of the US demand for oil. One thing that no one really talks about is that the oil from ANWR will not be earmarked for US use, but will go on the global market, for sale all over the world. This graph ignores the demand of other countries, especially China and India.







