A special meeting of the County Board was called this evening for two purposes:
1.) To discuss the problems with the new County Nursing Home
2.) To discuss the job performance of County Co-Administrator Denny Inman (in closed session)
Several persons showed up at 7:00 pm, sitting in the gallery. Curiously, the agenda included no provision for "Public Participation." (Someone mentioned that it is a requirement of any open public CB meeting, but I'm not sure of that.)
The meeting was called to order and role taken. Three persons were absent: Steve Beckett (Facilities Chair), Carl Weibel (Facilties Vice-Chair) and Denny Inman. This is not good. Within seconds, Johnathan Schroeder moved to adjourn. This was immediately challenged by Trish Avery, stating that a meeting had been called, members attended, and why waste the CB stipend to just go home? There was a fair amount of confusion over Parliamentary procedure from Tom Betz who was the subsitute Parliamentarian in Beckett's absence. Avery ended up withdrawing her challenge and called for the role. The motion to adjourn (recess, really) failed 22-3. (Schroeder, Happ, and Mossier all voting yes...to recess.)
Ron Bensyl -- who led the effort to call the meeting in the first place -- then stated that he had no questions on the County Nursing Home because no one was there to answer (Beckett, Weibel, Inman). So the CB moved into closed session... (for like, the 45th time or something in the past 12 months. joke.)
Those of us in the gallery filed out into the hall. Our merry band of benchwarmers included: myself, JJ Farney and his wife, Bob Kirchner (!), Duane Northrup, a few others plus press from the NG, WILL-580, AM1400, WCIA, and WICD.
But wait! At 7:30pm Weibel dashed into the CB room, and at 7:40, here comes Steve Beckett! Just in time for closed session, but nary a word to the press or any other board member in regards to Nursing Home questions. Apparently, Inman was tucked away in his office with his attorney.
The folks in the hall quickly bonded and for the next FOUR HOURS waited as the County Board debated the fate of Denny Inman.
Finally, around 11:30pm, open session resumed and we filed back in. Ron Bensyl moved to terminate Denny Inman's employment, effective immediately. This was promptly substituted by Tom Betz with a motion that sounded like a slap on the wrist: a letter will be sent stating Inman's good and bad results and giving him a four month probation or something. (I was a bit bleary eyed to get the entire gist.) The vote to substitute succeeded 13-12, and the main motion then succeeded 16-10... or so.
MIDNIGHT ANALYSIS: As for meeting goal #1, I am told this was the best that the board could do and hopefully, Mr. Inman starts being straight with the board and the public.
As for the CCNH discussion, I am appalled -- but not surprised. More of the same: tell us we have all the answers and info, and then evade legal requests for more info (as in, the special meeting tonight to discuss.) The meeting was called in plenty of time and at least ONE of the three persons who could answers the questions should have been there. Can someone please tell what's open and honest about this?
Clearly, the County Board can do better. And I'd like to be part of that improvement.
(DISCLOSURE: I am a candidate for County Board District 7)