Environment

New Nobel Laureate at U of I

I"m sure Prof. Don Wuebbles is a fine and distinguished academic.  However, even he was probably a little surprised this morning and found out that he was now a Nobel Laureate.

 

Somehow, the headline writer for the News-Gazette extended Wuebbles' work for the IPCC (Wuebbles doesn't show on a search of the IPCC website) into him being a Nobel Laureate based on their receipt of that award in 2007.  In fairness, the writer of the article doesn't come close to making that error and the online article's headline is different.

As a former collector of pennies for 1965 Nobel Peace Prize winner UNICEF, I'd like to also be known as a Nobel Laureate.

Global Warming Notes

I’ve not posted for awhile on IP, doing most of my writing about election reform issues at my county clerk blog.  I’m coming out of hiding because a couple items within my recent reading meld nicely with the Climate Research Unit scandal.

First, I just ran across Huxley’s Law, from Julian Huxley, the first director of UNESCO and a somewhat notable biologist. 

Sooner or later, false thinking brings wrong conduct.

Second, I’ve just begun Paul Johnson’s Modern Times.  The first chapter discusses the theory of relativity and the efforts to prove it.  This quote from Einstein  was telling in light of the leaked e-mails from the CRU.

“If it were proved that this effect [the red shift] does not exist in nature, then the whole theory would have to be abandoned.”

The article linked above details some of the efforts to prove or substantiate Einstein’s theory.   Granted, I haven’t read the author’s book, but the article, and Johnson’s book, suggest that efforts of scientists to prove Einstein’s theory had a great deal more good faith and intellectual rigor than we are seeing in the area of man made global warming.  No efforts to squelch opponents or to demonize skeptics.

Finally of course, we’ve got another Clout List scandal brewing at the University of Illinois.  Prof. Michael Schlesinger has apparently threatened a New York Times writer with the “Big Cutoff” for not towing the AGW line in his writing.

Who wrote BAN BIKES at Meadowbrook?

Someone scrawled a few brief messages of anti-cycling graffiti, in chalk, on the southernmost concrete path at Meadowbrook Park. The message -- in various wordings -- was "bikes are bad." I assume "bikes" refers to pedaled rather than motorcycles.

I am a bike rider. Was this message scrawled by someone who's been a victim of irresponsible pedaling? I wondered. I regard cycling on public thoroughfares the same way I regard all behaviors. It can be done correctly, or poorly. (I was nearly run down by a sidewalk pedaler tonight on my jog.)

I don't disparage drinking, I disparage drinking and driving. I don't disparage keggers, I disparage keggers in neighborhoods where people are trying to sleep. I don't disparage creativity, entrepreneurship or "speech" of any brand -- but like the Supreme Court, I know there are time/place/manner restrictions for all of them.

Who chalked the anti-cycling screed at Meadowbrook? In making your statement about civics, you committed an uncivil act. What drove you to do it?

Norman Borlaug dies at 95

Dr. Borlaug died Saturday the 12th, at 95 years old.  In 1970, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on high-yield crop strains, and massive increase in food production in formerly poor and famine-prone areas like Mexico and India.  Quoting the New York Times, "Yet his work had a far-reaching impact on the lives of millions of people in developing countries. His breeding of high-yielding crop varieties helped to avert mass famines that were widely predicted in the 1960s, altering the course of history. Largely because of his work, countries that had been food deficient, like Mexico and India, became self-sufficient in producing cereal grains.

His legacy is, like most people, complicated.  Such a massive increase in crop yields came at the price of a massive increase in the use of chemicals in crop production, for instance.  That said, I will not forget that there are litterally millions of people alive today because of his work.  In awarding Dr. Borlaug the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize, the committee stated "...more than any other single person of this age, he has helped to provide bread for a hungry world. We have made this choice in the hope that providing bread will also give the world peace."

The New York Times article reminds us that Dr. Borlaug was active into his 90s, serving on the faculty of Texas A&M University, continuing his work on crops.  Thank you sir.

 

HG

(H/T:  Reason Hit and Run Blog; Cafe Hayek)

Obama, Fire the Truther, Now!

If there's one thing that annoys the hell out of me, it's conspiracy theorists. Whether it be folks who believed Bill Clinton had some sort of Clintonista Death Squads offing problematic associates, people who'd swear to all that is holy that Bush was going to use emergency powers to cancel elections, throw people into FEMA death camps, and institute a fascist dictatorship, or yahoos who still believe that Obama isn't a natural born citizen... their arguments are always bizarre non sequiturs of disparate facts, half-truths, and a lot of utter BS.

And while the current conspiracy du jour is the Obama birthers, one particular group of conspiratorial nitwits still takes the cake in my book: 9/11 truthers.

9/11 truthers run the gamut of paranoid weirdos. Everything from devout antisemitic scumbags to irrational militant revolutionaries. They often get support from some of the nuttiest fringe politicians and ignorant celebrities from either side of the political spectrum here in the U.S. (examples such as Ron Paul's sucking up to them for nutterbutter votes and Cynthia McKinney's paranoid leftist delusions come to mind).

Today I learn that one of these scumbags is a top adviser to the White House on the environment. I was highly skeptical of the claim at first due to the source of the information, Fox News' own Glenn Beck, a nutter in his own right and probably the epitome of modern cable news yellow journalism. But in this case, Beck for all his flaws, found one that even the rest of the media is jumping on now. From ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper:

A top environmental official of the Obama administration issued a statement Thursday apologizing for past incendiary statement and denying that he ever agreed with a 2004 petition on which his name appears, a petition calling for congressional hearings and an investigation by the New York Attorney General into "evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur."

Van Jones, the Special Advisor for Green Jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality, is Number 46 of the petitioners from the so-called "Truther" movement which suggests that people in the administration of President George W. Bush "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."

In a statement issued Thursday evening Jones said of "the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever."

He did not explain how his name came to be on the petition. A source said Jones did not carefully review the language in the petition before agreeing to add his name.

The Washington Times confirmed that this wasn't some accidental signing:

Mike Berger, a spokesman for 911Truth.org, told the Washington Times over the phone that all of the signers had been verified by their group. He said 9/11Truth.org board members “spoke with each person on the list by phone or through email to individually confirm they had added their name to that list.”

It'd be impossible for someone, especially someone as politically savvy as Mr. Jones to be oblivious to what this group is about or what the intentions of any statement they wanted him to sign was about. The name of the group alone gives it away, and for something as sensitive as 9/11 would necessitate anyone without severe brain damage to make friggin sure what it was they were signing.

Mr. Jones' excuses ring hollow.

But as the ABC article notes, this is not his first foray into controversy:

In 2005 Jones told the East Bay Express that the acquittal of Rodney King's assailants in 1992 in that infamous police brutality case changed him significantly. "I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th," he said. "By August, I was a communist."

Jones and other young activists in 1994 formed a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM, rooted in Marxism and Leninsm.

It's still unclear in any of the news articles I've read thus far when exactly Mr. Jones stopped being a communist. But regardless of when it is clear that this is recent history, not something that can be dismissed as "you know those 60's, man, everybody was just crazy!" as folks have rationalized Bill Ayers. Or dismiss the paranoid and racist delusions of a pastor that was much closer to Obama than his supporters will ever admit (though Obama had numerous times in the past)... afterall Obama didn't make him part of his administration and disowned him when the pastor confirmed that it wasn't just taken out of context.

Nope, this guy was recently a communist and a supporter of the truther movement and now currently has the ear of the President of the United States. This is unacceptable. While everyone has the right to be as idiotic and utterly insane as they want to be when it comes to conspiratorial nonsense, there is no reason that someone with this kind of crap on their resume should be getting cushy government jobs in the administration. Obama needs to make it clear that 9/11 trutherism is unacceptable and incompatible with his administration and either have Van Jones resign or outright fire him.

With the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks coming up in roughly one week, the sooner the better. Anything less would be an insult to the American people.

As far as this story getting its traction from Glenn Beck, I think it safe to say that it doesn't excuse his other flaws and dubious nature. It is however a fairly strong indictment of the rest of the media for not catching on until after a hack like Beck found something they should have been asking about long ago.

Cap and Trade

Rush just reported that Tim Johnson is "on the fence" on the Cap and Trade bill before the House today.

This bill would have terrible effects on the US economy, including moving plenty of manufacturing to countries with much looser pollution standards than ours.

I was able to send his office an email, but currently his website won't load.

Has there been a change in our import or other policies related to sugar?

I discussed this tonight with one of my friends...

Pepsi has announced a "throwback" Pepsi made with sugar.  Snapple is advertising a new tea made with sugar.  You can buy Mexican Coca-Cola, made with real sugar, here in C-U (I saw some at the grocery store just this weekend!!), and it rocks!

We all know about the debate over high fructose corn syrup, and its ubiquity in our food supply.  We also know that if you use more corn making ethanol, you have less corn to make high fructose corn syrup with. 

So has there been a change in the import duties and other rules relating to sugar, or is this an attempt by beverage companies to exploit consumer desires for a more "natural" foodstuff?

Just curious...

Name Changes Ditched

You might recall a blog post last year regarding an effort to change the names of the Saline Branch Drainage Ditch and the Upper Salt Fork Drainage Ditch.  A year later, a decision has been reached and the ditches will remain ditches in name, at least for now.  The votes were 7-6 and 8-5 to keep the names so it hardly represents a mandate.  I'd be surprised if this issue doesn't come up again.  I've excerpted the two pages from the minutes of the US Geographic Names Board.

Ameren Cleanup Purchases

Ameren has now purchased two properties near its cleanup site at 5th & Hill in Champaign.

Yesterday:

[AmerenIP spokesman Leigh] Morris said the purchase of the house had nothing to do with contamination concerns.

"They're entitled to their opinion, and I'll say, unequivocally, they are wrong," Morris said.

Morris also said AmerenIP has no plans to buy any other properties around the Fifth and Hill street site. After the cleanup, he said, AmerenIP intends to sell the property.

Today:

AmerenIP spokesman Leigh Morris said the utility bought 507 E. Washington because "it was available and this will simply allow us to do ... remediation on that property," he said.

The house on the property will be demolished, he said.

AmerenIP will eventually dispose of the property after the soil is treated and after Ameren is awarded a "No Further Remediation" letter indicating no additional treatment is necessary, Morris said.

AmerenIP is not looking at buying any more properties in the neighborhood, he added.

"We're not in the real estate business," Morris said.

Discuss.

City Approves Ameren Cleanup Plan

Today's NG:

The city council gave its verbal support Tuesday to AmerenIP's plan to clean up a former manufactured-gas plant site at Fifth and Hill streets, starting in mid-April.

But council members were less enthusiastic about an administration proposal under which city staff would work with AmerenIP to transfer ownership of the 2.4-acre site to the city once the cleanup is complete for future development.

"Frankly, I don't see why it's important we own the property," said council member Marci Dodds.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Ameren Cleanup to Begin

Ameren site cleanup to start soon:

The cleanup of a former coal-gasification plant site at Fifth and Hill streets should begin early next month and is expected to take about a year to complete.

But a neighborhood group that represents residents who live near the north Champaign site said it doesn't think the cleanup plan goes far enough to deal with contaminated groundwater and vapors leaving the site.

The cleanup is expected to cost site owner AmerenIP between $6 million and $7 million. It will involve excavating 50,000 tons of soil and chemically treating deeper soils on the 2.4-acre site.

Most of the excavation will be performed under a large tent with air-treatment equipment to keep dust from leaving the site, according to Brian Martin, an Ameren consulting environmental scientist.

An open house to explain the plan will be held from 4 to 7 p.m. Wednesday at the Champaign City Building, 102 N. Neil St.

AmerenIP's cleanup plan was approved by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in January.

Discuss.

George Will - stirring the pot

George has written a couple articles lately I have found pretty interesting.

Yesterday, a piece about the morality of sex and food.  He observes:

Today "the all-you-can-eat buffet" is stigmatized and the "sexual smorgasbord" is not.

Not sure about the conclusions reached, but an intriguing point.

Today, he returns to the global warming debate, and pulls U of I in:

Citing data from the University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center, as interpreted on Jan. 1 by Daily Tech, a technology and science news blog, the column said that since September "the increase in sea ice has been the fastest change, either up or down, since 1979, when satellite record-keeping began." According to the center, global sea ice levels at the end of 2008 were "near or slightly lower than" those of 1979.

This claim was challenged by the NY Times and also by a letter to the editor in our very own NG recently.  It seems to me this ought to be a fact beyond dispute (one way or the other) - the huge political battle over this issue really does make it hard for the average guy.

 

 

Poor Guy

You lose the presidency by a nose.

You spend all this time and energy branding yourself as the environment guy.

Operah puts on the show at an opportune time when everyone is talking issues.

When it finally comes down to your time to shine and for people to talk about your work, you have to sit there and listen to the President-Elect talk about some scumbag governor.   Not even a mention in the headlines.

This guy can't get a break!  I wonder how many "bleeps" were going through his head during that press conference.

Obama should give this guy a do-over.  

 

Forest Preserve District Referendum

The NG yesterday endorsed the 2-cent tax increase being requested by the Champaign County Forest Preserve District.

One tax increase question before Champaign County voters on Nov. 4 is an easy one to comprehend and decide: it would give the traditionally conservative Champaign County Forest Preserve District (which has never asked for a property tax increase in its 60-year history) the power to raise its property tax rate by 2 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.

The cost to taxpayers: for the owner of a $100,000 home, an additional $6.67 a year. The owner of a $150,000 home would pay about $10 more each year. The tax increase would yield about $700,000 annually.

The payoff to taxpayers: money for land acquisition, for rehabilitation and replacement of existing facilities and for development of the much-anticipated rail to trail across eastern Champaign County.

There is some additional information about the referenda here.

Disclosure:  I volunteer on the District's Foundation Board.

Champaign Recycling

Today's News-Gazette:

Meeting in study session Tuesday night, the city council voted unanimously to direct staff to gather more information about expanding current recycling services, including possibly expanding recycling to apartments and increasing the number of materials collected.

But given a list of several options for expanding services, council members didn't narrow the list at all.

Some of the listed options included establishing commercial recycling, expanding special recycling events, increasing recycling education and marketing, expanding the city's drop-off site and increasing monitoring and auditing of haulers to make sure they recycle materials they pick up.

City Manager Steve Carter said after the meeting that "this will take months" and that it might be next summer before a final vote is cast to revamp recycling services.

A number of council members appear to want to bring recycling to apartment buildings, something that has been in place in Urbana since 1999. Currently, Champaign requires haulers to provide curbside recycling to single-family homes through four-unit apartments, and only requires that newspapers, plastic jugs, glass and tin and aluminum cans be picked up.

Discuss.

Urban Sprawl Talk Tonight at Urbana Free Library at 7:30pm

Curbing Urban Sprawl: What, Why, and How

Presentation and Discussion with Professor Brian Deal

Monday, September 15th at 7:30pm
Urbana Free Library Auditorium
210 W Green St

Land development has been increasing rapidly on the fringes of Champaign-Urbana, encroaching on some of the richest farmland in the world. Consequences include lost natural resources, increased transportation time and energy, and inadequate services. However, there are ways to reverse this trend and improve the quality of life for the citizens of our community, while preserving our resources. Learn more about urban sprawl, why we must deal with it, and how we can tackle this pressing issue.

Dr. Brian Deal is an Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Illinois. His research interests include the study of sustainability and urban land use transformation. He is the Director of the Smart Energy Design Assistance Center at UI, the Director of Research at Robert Allerton Park, and the Director of the Land use Evolution and impact Assessment Modeling (LEAM) Laboratory, an interdisciplinary laboratory dedicated to the study of the spatio-temporal dynamics of land-use change and their social, economic, and environmental consequences.

Green Tea Discussions
Sponsored by the Prairie Green Party

A different topic every third Monday of the month - same time and location. Membership meetings are on the first Monday of the month at 7:30pm in the Family Room of the Independent Media Center at 202 S Broadway in Urbana. Learn more and join the party at www.prairiegreens.org

Your 2008 Green County Board Candidates:

Please consider the environment when attending this event: Bike, Walk, Use the MTD, or Carpool

Effort to save Kickapoo starting

I just received the following email from Lori DeYoung (Dem candidate for Ill. House 104th):

Please join me and my committee as we support Ryce Tuggle's efforts to save Kickapoo. Ryce has started the KICK campaign (Kids Interested in Conserving Kickapoo) and has scheduled a rally/picket from 9 to noon on Saturday 9/6/08 at Kickapoo.   There is also a sign up tent to get petitions at Lincoln Square this Saturday at 7 a.m. 

Listen to Ryce and I on WITY starting tomorrow - we all can make a difference to save this wonderful park. Many of us have had the privilege of camping, fishing, hiking, listening to music and having picnics/reunions at Kickapoo - don't we owe it to Ryce, her friends, and all children to have this place to enjoy in the years to come?

Please let me know if you can join us - 

thanks - lori

New Forest Preserve Open

The Champaign County Forest Preserve District's new forest preserve is now open to the public.

Area residents have another site where they can get back to nature now that the Champaign County Forest Preserve District has opened the Sangamon River Forest Preserve near Fisher.

The district purchased the 160-acre site earlier this year from Ron and Karen Cook after receiving two grants totaling more than $1 million from the Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources.

Andee Chestnut, public information director for the forest preserve district, said there has been some development at the site, and more needs to be done. Chestnut said, however, that development had proceeded far enough to open the preserve to the public.

"There have been people wanting to visit," Chestnut said. "Now they can."

(Disclosure:  I serve on the CCFPD's Foundation Board.)

Champaign Evaluates Sustainability

Yesterday's News-Gazette:

The city council will discuss a "sustainability inventory report" Tuesday that is meant to show where the city stands in terms of energy usage and conservation.

The council meets in regular session at 7 p.m. at the Champaign City Building, 102 N. Neil St. The sustainability report will be discussed at a post-council study session.

Sustainability is a popular issue these days with cities across the nation. It is defined as meeting current needs without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs, and involves balancing environmental, economic and social concerns.

Assistant City Manager Dorothy David said the city needed an update of where it stands before moving on to new initiatives.

"We want to know where we started from," said David. "This report is a baseline. We felt as we move forward to really be proactive in sustainability and environmental concerns, we needed to know what we're doing right now."

Discuss.

ANWR: In Perspective

There's a lot of hay being made over whether we should drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve. Republicans seem to think that it is the solution to energy independence and will bring about cheaper gas. Democrats, well, they seem to be vaguely against drilling. I was astonished to see this graph, which gives you an idea of the scale of the whole thing:

ANWR graph

I post this not to encourage or decry drilling in ANWR, just to show the scope of what the discussion is about. At it's peak, ANWR might produce the equivalent of 3% of the US demand for oil. One thing that no one really talks about is that the oil from ANWR will not be earmarked for US use, but will go on the global market, for sale all over the world. This graph ignores the demand of other countries, especially China and India.

Syndicate content