Energy

Nuclear Power

From the AP wire:  McCain calls for building 45 new nuclear reactors.  One of the more pertinent passages:

McCain said the 104 nuclear reactors currently operating around the country produce about 20 percent of the nation's annual electricity needs.

"Every year, these reactors alone spare the atmosphere from the equivalent of nearly all auto emissions in America. Yet for all these benefits, we have not broken ground on a single nuclear plant in over thirty years," he said. "And our manufacturing base to even construct these plants is almost gone."

 

I've long thought that nuclear power offers the best chance to generate energy for the US while minimizing the enviromental costs.  I'm not a head-in-the-sand idiot; I know the costs, dangers, and problems with storing used (spent?) nuclear fuel.  I just think nuclear power, versus coal ("clean" or otherwise), oil, or natural gas, offers the most upside with the least downside.

The remainder of the article goes on to McCain's idea for "clean" coal, an idea I'm much less in favor of.

 

As IP says, discuss...

Global Warming Scam - A Convenient Pretext.

Quo usque tandem abutere, Catalina, patientia nostra?

The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3038) is going into discussion.  Doubly arrogant, they think that not only can they legislate against physics and geology, but also they believe they can hoodwink the public with this pretext for more devastating and stifling control and crippling taxation.  And they call it securityHow dare they!?  Are the people really so stupid as this to suck up this drivel?   This is the same Joe Lieberman who we saw on TV with his hand up Senator McCain working McCain's mouth.

"Global warming has little to do with the improving the environment or reducing pollution. The real agenda is taxation and further consolidation of authority into a powerful centralized and increasingly global government." 

more here.

Lawsuits Discussed for Former Power Site

From today's News-Gazette:

Kennedy & Madonna is currently representing about 20 property owners in the Oakwood area who live near a fly-ash landfill.

Madonna said he had been speaking with Claudia Lennhoff, executive director of Champaign County Health Care Consumers. Lennhoff is active in the Fifth and Hill Neighborhood Rights Campaign that has formed to represent residents who live near the former coal-gas site near Fifth and Hill streets.

"We've been speaking with Claudia and looking over documents the past few weeks to see if there's anything we can do to assist the community," he said. "I will be in town April 10."

It's too early to say what type of legal challenge the firm might make if it does become involved, he said.

He said there are thousands of former coal-gas manufacturing sites across the country that are in need of environmental cleanup.

"The potential for off-site contamination is a definite possibility and is something the residents should be concerned about," Madonna said. "The question is how far off site it's gone and to what extent are residents are being exposed and have been exposed to contaminants."

The 3.5-acre site – between Fifth and Sixth streets and Washington and Church streets – is owned by AmerenIP. The utility is expected this week to begin extensive testing, including soil borings and drilling monitoring wells, of the neighborhood surrounding the site to determine how far off site contamination has traveled.

AmerenIP officials have said they hope to begin a multimillion dollar cleanup of the site by next year.

Discuss.

UI Utility Deficit Stories

There have been rumors about the UI's utility deficit for almost a year, and the News-Gazette had two pieces on Sunday about it.  The first:

The deficit – slightly more than a year's worth of utility expenses – built up over five years as energy prices jumped by double digits and state appropriations failed to provide extra money for the UI to heat, light and cool its ever-expanding campuses, officials say.

"We had a budget for utility costs based on projections and recent history, and those utility costs soared well beyond what the expectations and projections were," Hardy said. "So we had to tap into various university reserves or savings to be able to pay our utility bills."

Cyclical spikes in energy costs are common, and prices tend to average out over time, he said. The UI used internal borrowing in the past, repaying other funds as the prices of natural gas, coal or oil dropped.

But natural gas prices spiked in 2004 and never came down. Coal prices rose as worldwide demand increased, particularly from China and India. And oil eventually topped $100 a barrel.

The second:

When Walter Knorr was hired as the UI's chief financial officer in early 2007, one of his first assignments was to prepare a report on the magnitude of the problem. The UI audit was not made public, but White said the findings were "very, very similar" to those in the state audit released Feb. 26.

Among them:

– The UI hadn't assigned anyone the task of reporting budget deficits for activities that cross campuses, such as utilities.

– University policy called for trustees to be briefed quarterly on budgeted versus actual spending, but utility costs weren't highlighted in those reports.

– UI policy was unclear about when trustee approval is required for money transfers between state accounts and unrestricted reserve funds.

– The accounting involved with utilities was "excessively complex," spread across all campuses and the central administration.

Discuss.

More on FutureGen's Demise

From the News-Gazette:

"The Department of Energy has turned its back on us," U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson, R-Urbana, told The News-Gazette. "This is like changing the rules after the final score has been posted on the scoreboard. To me, Secretary Bodman's response this morning was a slap in the face.

"This is the worst form of bureaucratic arrogance and insensitivity that I have seen in my 40 years in politics."

Sen. Dick Durbin,D-Ill., echoed Johnson's anger and frustration, saying the Illinois delegation will take the fight directly to the president.

"In 25 years on Capitol Hill, I have never witnessed such a cruel deception," Durbin said in a written release. "For five years, the Department of Energy has urged our state and others to pursue, at great expense and sacrifice, this critically important energy project.

"When the city of Mattoon was chosen over possible locations in Texas, the secretary of energy set out to kill FutureGen," Durbin said.

More:

And while Illinois politicians are decrying the news that FutureGen may be no more, FutureGen Alliance spokesman Lawrence Pacheco said the alliance has gotten no official statement from the Department of Energy.

"All the alliance has heard is vague statements about how the DOE wants to restructure the project," Pacheco said.

As far as the alliance is concerned, Pacheco said, it still has a cooperative agreement with the department, "and it's still in effect today," he said.

Tribune:

The Bush administration appeared on the verge of killing off the $1.8 billion FutureGen project only a day after the president highlighted plans for a big hike in energy research spending in his State of the Union address.

...

Members of Illinois' congressional delegation, including Republican allies of President Bush, reacted with fury to the development.

"The [Energy Department] has turned its back on us," charged U.S. Rep. Timothy Johnson, a Republican whose district includes Mattoon. "We played by their rules. . . . Secretary Bodman's response this morning was a slap in the face."

A spokeswoman for Bodman said soaring cost projections and technological advances have led the department to rethink the project even as it remains committed to its goals.

"Clean coal remains a cornerstone of the administration's [energy] vision," spokeswoman Julie Ruggiero said. She said Bodman would announce a revamped plan for FutureGen "within days" but declined to say whether the project in Mattoon would survive.

Mattoon:

There was bipartisan outrage by state elected officials on DOE’s plans to dismantle FutureGen. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich called it “an example of politics at its worst.”

“On November 30, 2007, the Department of Energy sent a letter reaffirming that the project was moving forward as planned. Only after it became clear that an Illinois site would be chosen over a Texas site, the Department suggested the project be delayed and now today, that it be dismantled,” the governor said.

State Rep. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, called the FutureGen project the most bipartisan effort in state government last year.

“FutureGen was the one bright spot. It was how things were meant to be in government for achieving a common goal. I will cooperate anyway I can with members of Congress to see that FutureGen does come to Mattoon,” Rose said.

Interesting reaction from Texas:

 

FutureGen Texas Regional Coordinator Hoxie Smith of Midland on Friday confirmed the prospect that the DOE either will award "a piece" of the project to the Basin or a private company will build a plant using FutureGen technology on 600 acres north of Penwell, 20 miles west of Odessa.

Awaiting his flight to Dallas Friday afternoon in Washington, Melton said Odessa city and Chamber of Commerce officials will meet with a company there next month to review its plans for a near zero emissions coal-fired electrical plant producing carbon dioxide for oilwell injection.

"The subject of FutureGen came up in discussions with all four leaders and I don't think anybody knows 100 percent what is going to happen," said Melton after attending the U.S. Conference of Mayors. "They all think it will be scaled back because the DOE would have to put a lot more money into it than they want to.

"There are rumors of breaking it into pieces and I think we will get something going. But I'm not sure it will be FutureGen. We have a meeting in February with a company looking at us for a project similar to FutureGen."

What our Presidential Candidates Should Really Be Concerned About

This article, from the on-line New York Times, best describes the challenges facing the next president.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/magazine/27world-t.html?pagewanted=8&_r=1&th&emc=th

 

I always remain surprised that candidtaes are not asked who they would consider ideal members of their cabinet if they were elected.    This would be a significant insight into a candidate's thinking and policies.      

FutureGen Hope

From today's News-Gazette, in the wake of yesterday's story:

A consortium of some of the largest coal producers and users in the world on Friday offered to pay a greater portion of the cost of the $1.8 billion FutureGen clean coal plant.

If the proposal is accepted by the Department of Energy, which previously was responsible for 74 percent of the costs, plans to build FutureGen in Coles County may proceed without future delays, according to a statement from U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson, R-Urbana.

"The Alliance's movement on this issue gives us momentum and strengthens our resolve to get this project back where it belongs," Johnson's statement said. "I am strongly opposed to the notion of breaking up this project into pieces as has been suggested by the Department of Energy once they found out Mattoon was the chosen site."

Discuss.

More FutureGen Cold Water

More reasons to be less-than-optimistic that this thing will ever be built:

Plans for a clean-burning FutureGen power plant may drastically change, said U.S. Rep. John Shimkus, R-Collinsville, who thinks the Department of Energy's plan to restructure could mean breaking it into different sites around the country.

Shimkus said Thursday he believes downsizing and restructuring FutureGen make it more feasible.

"I'm afraid if we go as planned, we get nothing," Shimkus said Thursday in a phone interview with The News-Gazette.

"The DOE is scrambling for a way to do it with the current cost escalations," Shimkus said. "Rescoping means a lot of things. I think it could mean the ability to produce more power and sell it on the grid, (or do) limited research at one site and another aspect of the research at another site."

More links on CapFax.

FutureGen Cold Water

Rich Miller over at CapFax is urging caution, rather than celebration:

Yesterday’s announcement that the lucrative FutureGen project would be sited in Illinois created a lot of hype. But the Bush administration’s Energy Department wasn’t at the press conference. The US government’s share of the project’s cost is huge, and DOE officials have been grumbling about the rising costs of the project for a couple of weeks (a bit before Illinois started to get private signals that it was ahead in the bidding war with Texas) so that should have sent up a lot more red flags than it did…

Read the whole thing.

UPDATE:  From today's News-Gazette:

Jack Slutz, the acting principal deputy assistant secretary for fossil energy, released a statement Tuesday calling for restructuring the current agreement between the federal government and the alliance, which is composed of power companies from all over the world.

Slutz said that because clean coal technology is so important, the public deserves to get the best technology in the most cost-efficient way. Restructuring is the answer, he said, and more information will be forthcoming in the next month.

FutureGen Alliance spokesman Lawrence Pacheco called the statement "baffling."

FutureGen to Mattoon!

Congratulations!

UPDATE:  I was listening to the announcement on WDWS, but the NG had the story a few minutes before the live announcement.  I'll collect links to stories and such as the day continues.  Feel free to post anything you find, along with your thoughts and reactions, in the comments.

LINKS:

FutureGen Predictions

Mine is Tuscola, and it more of a guess than a prediction.

FutureGen Announcement Fluff

The NG had this fluff article about the FutureGen selection on Tuesday.

Brian Moody says it feels like Christmas Eve in Tuscola.

He just isn't sure if there will be anything under the tree if the announcement is made Tuesday on which town gets the $1.5 billion FutureGen plant.

"I haven't been sleeping very much at all this week," said Moody, the executive director of Tuscola Economic Development Inc. "This is the culmination of a lot of work by a lot of people."

Meanwhile, the Mattoon community is filled with nervous energy as it awaits the decision from the 14-member FutureGen Alliance board.

"We're on the edge of the seats," City Administrator Allan Gilmore said. "After all, we've been working on this since February of 2006."

Keep your fingers crossed for either Illinois site.

FutureGen Announcement Tuesday?

There's been lots of speculation that a FutureGen announcement may be coming soon:

Developers of a $1.5 billion experimental low-pollution power plant said today they are ready to announce whether it will be built in Illinois or Texas, despite an unexpected letter from their federal partner advising them to slow down.

The Futuregen Alliance, coal and power companies planning to construct the plant in partnership with the Department of Energy, says it will announce the plant’s future home at a news conference Tuesday in Washington, D.C.

Four towns — Mattoon and Tuscola in east-central Illinois, Jewett in east Texas and Penwell in west Texas — are in the running.

But a DOE official told FutureGen Alliance chief executive Michael Mudd in a letter Monday that the developers are moving too fast.

The department will not have issued what is known as a record of decision — a final step indicating all four sites are suitable — by Tuesday, wrote James Slutz, acting
principal deputy assistant secretary for fossil energy.

Arrangements for the announcement “(were) done without any consultation with the department,” Slutz said.

“We consider it inadvisable for the alliance to schedule any site selection announcement or media advisory at this time without prior consultation with the department,” Slutz added.

Just a hunch:  I think a delay hurts Illinois' chances.

(Hat tip: CapFax)

NK Giving Up Nukes?

in

I've been out of the loop for a week or so, but I just caught this, and it seems rather huge to me:

North Korea's decision to abandon its nuclear program could be significant, especially because it appears that it will not rely on UN inspectors but will instead involve US technicians overseeing the actual dismantling of North Korean nuclear facilities.

That's outstanding.

Big Oil in Disarray

in

How else can you explain that our gas prices have been falling while oil prices have been at record highs

Greener Power is more attractive

The News-Gazette today reported that you can now get energy credits in Illinois.

Illinoisans who buy solar panels, wind generators or other types of renewable energy equipment can now get a little more bang for their buck.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich recently signed legislation creating a statewide net-metering program, which means customers can use excess power they generate through such equipment as a credit against electricity they buy from their utility company. In a year when electricity rates jumped significantly, that could make a big difference in a customer's bill.

Ameren apparently didn't offer this before, but says they're not opposed to it. It'll be interesting to see how many people make the conversion. If I didn't have a huge big shady tree on the east side of my house, thereby limiting that side's exposure to sunlight, it would be a lot more attractive to me. Maybe if I put them on top of the garage?

Ameren Rate Relief Estimates

in

Ameren has made a PDF available here

The "relief" won't nearly match the hype of this week's credit-taking flyaround, of course.

One-Month Budget

It looks like the Illinois Democratic Party General Assembly has come to some sort of agreement on a one-month emergency budget that will allow them the keep fighting over the really important stuff all the way through July.

Whatever needed to be worked out among the Republican and Democratic caucuses of each chamber appears to be worked out. At least, there’s enough of an agreement for the legislative leaders to publicly say that the House is expected to approve it Wednesday and the Senate to consider it Friday.

The summary from House Speaker Michael Madigan and House Minority Leader Tom Cross: It’s a maintenance budget that simply extends the fiscal year 2007 budget with some changes. But it has no new revenue and no “member initiatives,” or “pork barrel spending” that pays for special projects in legislators’ districts.

Next on the discussion table: new revenue to support a full, 12-month state budget. “We haven’t had a discussion on available revenue,” Cross said outside of the governor’s Capitol office Tuesday afternoon, “and we had no discussion about electricity.”

Electric rate freeze action is still possible in the next couple of days — Senate President Emil Jones Jr. said he’s just about fed up. “I resent all the stalling that’s been taking place as it relates to those negotiations,” he said after budget talks. “We may, even though I’m opposed to it, let them go ahead and have the freeze.”

I hope they just keep passing these one-month budgets until next year.  That's really the best-case scenario for the state at this point, I think.  No pork and no tax increases - I can live with that, especially given the alternatives the Democrats were considering a few months ago.

That said, it'll be interesting to see if Senate President Emil Jones allows a rate freeze for ComEd to move, or if this is just a negotiating tactic.

Urbana's Kerr Avenue Development

Urbana's Kerr Avenue development, on city-owned property, is progressing:

Each design calls for about 30 different units of housing, including town homes, duplexes and single-family homes.

Because the city has used federal HOME funds to acquire the site and to pay for design work, the homes will have to be affordable to people making 80 percent of the area median income or less, Tyler said. Another goal of the project, she said, is to use only 10 percent of the normal energy expenditure for a house.

Using permeable paving stones for streets, extensive insulation, energy-efficient windows and systems like solar-powered water heaters are some ways the project could cut energy costs, Farr said.

Farr is due to report back to the city council in about a month with a final site plan. The city will then likely issue a request for proposals for developers later this summer. The city will also need to put together a financing plan, which will likely require some federal and state subsidies, Tyler said.

Construction isn't likely to begun until next year at the earliest, she said.

Discuss.

Power Rates Can Be Eased Responsibly

in

Having sought public office as the Representative for the 103 Legislative District in the State, I have observed both the Local and State political activities with more than a passing interest. In fact, my concern and disgust with the political leaders of State and Local offices, precipitated that effort. It was obvious the State did not have leadership who’s qualifications were based on ability or qualifications to solve problems for the public. But rather, their abilities were deceit and ineffective short sighted political solutions to get votes. Unfortunately for Illinois, the leadership and their deficiencies to solve issues which had contributed to the rabid problems facing the state, were re-elected, inability baggage in hand.

Suffering citizens should not be surprised the newly re-elected leadership were unable to solve the impending problems with Power Rates, Health Care and unfunded State programs, etc. For even during the campaign season, questions about these issues were cleverly sidestepped by reading prepared generic answers authored by State leadership. It was politically efficient to deceive rather than suggest solutions. They failed to realize, that ineffective political solutions only caused the problems to exacerbate. For instance, the short sighted proposed rate freeze extension sponsored by Ms. Jakobsson, immediately failed after the election. It failed because its only purpose was to attract votes, rather than solving the impending Rate Increase problem.

On the matter of a solution for the Power Rate Increases, the State must first define and realize many facets of the problem. The first facet is recognizing that the State is at fault because of very bad legislation and a laissez-faire attitude for 10 years. It has taken 10 years to cause this problem and to even suggest it can be solved in a couple of months under restrictive timeline is irresponsible. The solution will take time and contain many comprehensive and effective parts, including State participation to correct its mistake. Secondly, the State must realize that the corporate leadership of the power company are very astute businessmen. After all, the state not only split the company but fixed and decreased the gross receipts for the power company by 20% for 10 years. But even under such inconceivable government interference, the corporate leadership of the power companies re-invented the companies and still remained solvent and made a profit for shareholders. By comparison, no one would ever suggest that if the State of Illinois lost 20% of its revenues with no ability to raise taxes, the present leadership of the State could even consider solvency. That being said, the very capable business minds of the power company should not be considered adversarial and a part of the problem, but rather a valuable asset to help solve the problem. Instead of signing an unpopular and unnecessary smoking ban legislation which, according to the Comptroller, costs the state nearly 80 million dollars, the Governor should not approve that deception and retain those tobacco tax revenues, concentrate on the major problems, and considering using all or a part of those tobacco revenues as a contribution to the solution of the Power Rate problem. That money could be used to pay the bond interest that would allow consumers to distribute only the rate increases over a period of 3-5 years.

3-5 years is more than adequate time to allow energy conservation planning by each individual home and business to implement energy saving policies to reduce energy costs by reducing usage. Unlike the State, people will not wait 3-5 years to change, they realize delay will cost them their money in the long haul. Additionally, the money saved by the power users will be spent anyway on other taxable products and the state will recover some of that money through normal sales tax methods. Secondly, the State should abandon turning back the clocks. That no cost solution to energy problems used in the 70’s was effective and saved nearly 8-10% energy production fuel costs over the year. Additionally, the daylight hours at the end of the work day increases productivity by 12% thereby reducing the costs of construction and other outside businesses because they can work at least an extra hour in daylight. Finally, there is no better way to encourage lower rates than allowing businesses to increase their operating revenues from multiple sources within the same company. Inexplicably, the State legislated the power company be broken into two more inefficient separate companies, one producing power, and another distributing power. That is like splitting General Motors into two companies, one producing Cadillac’s, and another producing Chevrolet’s. General Motors would not exist. The least expensive power and delivery is that which is produced within the same company because the combination of operating revenues from both sources, production and distribution, allows each service to be less expensive because of the cash flow influences of the other source. Any legislation to provide power rate relief, should allow the companies to re-combine and benefit from long standing business operational principals of diversity. These are inexpensive, hammerless common sense solutions which demonstrate to the citizens that the State does accept responsibility for bad law, allows consumers both time structured payment relief and also time to utilize the opportunity to vary their consumer habits.

These solutions also show good faith and encourage the power company to lower rates by allowing them to return to the type of company existing before the ill conceived legislation caused this problem. The continual Daylight Savings Time legislation has long been necessary and will not only have the side benefits of improving the quality of life, but will also allow more flexible consumer habits concerning energy consumption.

Fearless, qualified and determined individuals can find solutions, but the critical nature of these problems has overwhelmed our present leaders because of their lack of ability to solve problems. Political/personal fear of not being re-elected because of suggesting difficult answers, has hamstrung the entire process (“we were hamstrung by a total lack of knowledge”, Webster). It was once said, “Your family and business is not safe when the Legislation is in session” and nothing could be more true of the present leadership. NyQuil is not tasty, but it works. Time to solve the problem, or be replaced with those who can.

Syndicate content