Nothing to Fear

I dropped by a party this evening and had several discussions about the upcoming presidential election.  This party was dominated by Democrats and several expressed real concern about Obama's chances in November.

The Gallup Daily Tracking Poll is showing McCain up 48-45, his highest showing since May.  It is hard to watch the dreaded MSM without hear that Sarah Palin has "electrified the Republican base".  Pictures of large McCain/Palin rallies are flooding in from all across the country.  It seems that Republicans might have the momentum.

I don't think McCain has much of a chance.  In fact, I think McCain is probably doomed.  And I think he knows it.  Everyone I talked to at this party watched the Republican convention last week, and none of them could tell me what the message was from the convention.  I reminded them that the focus was "reform" and "change".

It is laughable that the Republican Party thinks it can run on the messages of "reform" and "change" and win this election.

But it is fascinating to see the fear in so many Democrat's eyes.  There is a real sense out there that this is the one: if this election goes to the Republicans then there is something seriously wrong with the world.  There is definitely something wrong with the world, of course, but I'm not sure it has much to do with politics.

So I told these folks what I really believe.  Give Obama money, and sign up to work in Indiana.  Knock on doors, man a phone bank, take an old lady across town to wait in line for two hours at the DMV so she can get an ID and legally vote in that state.  Give Obama some more money.  Get involved!

To many this seems like news from outer space.  "Oh yeah ... I could do something!"  Who knew?

But you know ... even if Obama loses there is nothing to fear.  Sometimes it takes a real, painful and unthinkable disaster to create the kind of change this country really needs.  If McCain wins, there will be tens of millions of people who will have to face the fact that the Democrats don't know how to win the big one.  And that could destroy the Democrats, who have done their best to play Republican-Lite for far too long now.

And that might not be a bad thing at all.  Because, after all, four more years of conservative economics and neo-con foreign policy will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that conservatives simply cannot be trusted to run a country effectively.  So while another loss might hurt badly, it might actually be just the thing this country needs.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
redstatewannabe's picture

There is a real sense out there that this is the one: if this election goes to the Republicans then there is something seriously wrong with the world.

I thought the exact same thing when I saw all the votes Al Gore rec'd.

Sometimes it takes a real, painful and unthinkable disaster to create the kind of change this country really needs.

That is exactly what some Republican's have been saying - if we can survive 4 years of Obama, ...

And that could destroy the Democrats, who have done their best to play Republican-Lite for far too long now.

So, you wants Dems in Congress and a Dem nominee to be more left than Obama?  How about the Dems give up the pro-choice plank of the platform and just campaign on economics and foreign policy?

It is both scary and reassuring that your concerns and views on this are so very similar to those on the right. 

D. Boon's picture

Gore's popular vote win wasn't a surprise to most people.  Clinton left office with a 60+% approval rating, if I remember correctly, and his eight years in office were peaceful and prosperous.  Gore should have been a shoe-in against a lightweight ideologue like Bush, who seemed to struggle to form a coherent sentence through most of the 2000 election.  And, frankly, the only reason Bush won that election is because of the shenanigans in FLA, which I won't bother debating.

Yes, I want the Democrats to veer sharply to the left and regain the ground lost since 1980.  Something along the line of a new New Deal is in order to deal with the incredible problems we are now facing.  The only reason this election is close right now is because Obama has refused to take on conservativism in a tangible way.  He has failed, imo, to project the vision of a Democratic America, ala FDR.  A vision that I would argue is incredibly appealing to a vast majority of Americans, if the polls are any suggestion.  Universal health care, green energy programs, increased spending on infrastructure, restored prestige on the world stage.  These are not the plans of the GOP, and he must hit them hard for that.

Finally, on abortion, you probably know that I lean pro-life over pro-choice.  But I read an article recently that summarized my feelings very well.  It's a quick one if you have the time.

Senator Obama is articulating policies that permit faithful Catholics to follow the church’s admonition that we continue to explore ways to give greater protection to human life.

Consider the choices: A Catholic can either continue on the failed and uncertain path of seeking to overturn Roe, which would result in the individual states doing their own thing, not necessarily, or in most states even likely, protective of the unborn. Or Senator Obama’s approach could be followed, whereby prenatal and income support, paid maternity leave and greater access to adoption would be relied upon to reduce the incidence of abortion.

I am not a Catholic, but I think this guy is on the money, fwiw.  Cheers!

redstatewannabe's picture

Can you trust a guy on the abortion issue who wouldn't vote to give protection to babies that survived abortion attempts?

Is there really a problem with access to adoption?  Older couples are lining up to adopt babies, aren't they?

 

Older couples are lining up to adopt babies, aren't they

Judging by the number of kids in foster care, I would venture to guess that you are wrong.

redstatewannabe's picture

foster care kids are not always eligible for adoption, and they are not always babies

Clinton left office with a 60+% approval rating
...
Gore should have been a shoe-in
...
the only reason Bush won that election is because of the shenanigans in FL

Let's not forget that the stock market tanked a few months before the election. I think that certainly played into the election.