Perhaps publicly vetting a Vice Presidential candidate at a time when the Republican Party is beginning to coalesce around the McCain candidacy isn’t wise, but here goes. I’m really hoping that McCain doesn’t select Romney as his VP pick.
It seems that Romney is the choice of many of the beltway types, or as Jonah Goldberg put it, the “rightwing wonkosphere”. But I just don’t get a sense that he does much to excite the grassroots base of the party. Dick Morris penned a great article that exposes just how weak Romney was and is as a candidate.
My hope is that McCain finds a conservative running mate with the credentials and philosophy to excite the base. It wouldn’t hurt to find someone who can help in either a target state or with a key demographic group.
A few names have been mentioned that have the potential to excite the base, but also have some deficiencies. Sarah Palin, the Governor of Alaska and Bobby Jindal, the Governor of Louisiana, both have a lot to offer but both are in their first term as Governors. Huckabee excites part of the base but turns off perhaps an even bigger part with his protectionism and tax positions. Carly Fiorina just doesn’t have a track record that will convince conservatives that she’s one of them. Charlie Crist, like Jindal and Palin is pretty green plus comes off as more of the pragmatist than the true believer, ironically, in part, because of his endorsement of McCain in the primaries.
Of the most talked about candidates I like Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota and Rob Portman, former OMB director and U.S. Congressman. Both have the executive and legislative experience, are right on the issues, and have appeal in midwestern battle ground states.
But my personal favorite would be John Kasich, former Congressman from Ohio and some time Fox News television personality. Kasich represents the type of populist conservatism that I think is underrepresented in the national Republican party. He complements McCain’s fiscal conservatism very well and adds a strong record in opposition to corporate welfare, a long forgotten issue by both parties. He’s conservative on social issues and hails from the ultimate swing state of Ohio via his Pennsylvania birthplace. He comes from a working class back ground and his expertise on budget issues is unmatched by any of the candidates.
There’s not much chatter about Kasich which probably isn’t a good thing for his few partisans such as Quin Hillyer and Michael Novak. Of course, Vice Presidential picks have very often been surprising so perhaps Kasich is in play but no one knows it. He’d excite the base and bring solid expertise to the White House, while giving conservatives something to look forward to in the post McCain party.







It sounds like Pawlenty is considered one of the front runners. I was impressed by Jindal's drive and intelligence, if not his ideology. Palin would have been a long shot - not just because of the inexperience, but because she's from Alaska.
Gov. Pallin just had a scandal involving influencing police to get back at a former brother-in-law blow up in her face. Gov. Jindal for some reason very publicly announced this week he was not in consideration for veep. And Jill Stanek apparently can't stand Carly Fiorina so you're likely very correct on the 'track record' issue, FWIW. You're right about the chatter seeming to coalesce around Romney but I think McCain's going to go with someone a bit surprising, as you prefer. He needs the buzz and distraction of someone "new" to get past the last few days' worth of gaffes and turn the corner away from Obama's ongoing successful overseas listening tour.
But my personal favorite would be John Kasich,
In case there was any doubt, you are officially a "wonk" with this call Mark. (And I am too.)
I really liked Kasich when he was thinking of running/running in 2000 - I was bummed when he dropped out to endorse GW.
He's been out of politics for quite a while now - I'd love to see him get back in somewhere, but I don't expect it.
Putting the government where it belongs ... in your pants!
John Kasich...if only. What a great guy. His budget experience and philosophy are solid. He can hold his own in any debate and he is the conservative real deal. Ditto for Portman. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening.
Both candidates (McCain and Obama) may feel they need an executive branch-type running mate.
More on Rob Portman-http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/stories/index.ssf?/base/news/1209025824269030.xml&coll=2&thispage=1
I like your thinking of course Mark, Rob Portman sounds good and I had forgotten about John Kasick who would be great on TV. Romney would be a good candidate if they pick him but I do agree with you there will be something missing. Having either Portman or Kasick from Ohio would be great and McCain isn't doing badly in Ohio so I think it would pull it into a win column. I like both of their stance's on the issues, Kasick's presence on television and the fact he maybe better known after his run for president I think puts him over the top for me too.
The Palin thing is a lame attempt at a scandal, but she has her hands full with a baby anyway. Pawlenty is best, and Kasich is an intriguing dark horse.
McCain hates Romney; a Romney pick would make McCain look weak. It also would tick off everyone who voted against Romney in the primary, and McCain cannot afford that.
Both candidates (McCain and Obama) may feel they need an executive branch-type running mate.
When I think of executive branch running mate for Obama and McCain, I visualise the rope going over the executive branch and the horse started running to consummate the execution (figuratively).
I agree. John Kasich would be a good pick. I had put him out of mind until I saw him this week on Fox. He can bring the economic factor into play as well as his ties to Ohio and Pennsylvania.
McCain's biggest problem is that, at the end of the day, principled conservatives don't like him and don't agree with his relatively recent positons on a number of issues (immigration comes to mind). VP picks can help (see: Dick Cheney, 2000; remember 'gravitas'?) but can't make an unattractive candidate suddenly wonderful. I think we Republicans are in for a beating come November. Romney is another Hillary Clinton-esque, do anything-say-anything-to get elected- carpet-bagging pol who will help some, but will also confirm that McCain is casting about for practical fixes to a troubled campaign. Kasich may be the best answer. Imagine how the capital markets will react if and when we elect a do-anything-say-anything 44-year old uber-liberal whose understanding of global issues is almost as deep as Katie Couric's evening newscast.
Big E
www.big-e-blog.blogspot.com
Everyone knows where I am coming from being Romney's guy, but Mark does have a point. I agree that Kacich would have been a great guy for GW's second term, but I think it is by the board now. I think all the other candidates named except Bobbie the Brain Bo Jingle, are too unknown. I think Bobbie is too young. I will take your word that Romney would piss off the Huckabee backers and maybe some diehard Thompson folks like Mark, but the point is well taken. If we are going down this road and we know that Ms. Rice adds nothing, who you need to look to is Newt himself. I still have my Don Wade and Roma (I swaute Newt) bumpersticker, so I think he would be a great choice. He has had as much exposure as John Kacich on Fox and the man is my favorite policy wonk (like me). He would make a hell of an intersting choice, especially if McCain could make use of the guys like Thompson, Huck, and Romney in a kitchen cabinet.
Just for the record, I don't think Romney "pi$$es off" anyone. I just don't think that he excites many. I'd like someone who can bring some excitement to the ticket.
Kasich for vice president
He is conservative, articulate, experienced and knowledgeable. He should get much of the credit for the balanced budgets during the Clinton administration. The names on the short-list.... Pawlenty, Portman, Romney.... are either lightweights (no names) or have strong negatives (ie..Romney). Plus, Kasich could help carry Ohio, and his common --- heartland --- values will play well throughout most of the country, except in liberal bastions. (I know Kasich is considering a run for Ohio governor, but he could drop that, allowing Portman to run for that office, and Kasich could take the national stage where he belongs. We would all have been much better off if Kasich had won the presidency when he last tried.)
Gary Clouser
wow, this site if full of conservative wonks :-)
Ain't it wonderful!!!!!!!