This article http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/08/post-11.html#more discusses how Alberto Gonzales has undermined federal prosecutions and undermined the effectiveness of the Justice Department.
Alberto Gonzales is tough on crime? Hardly.
Posted August 17th, 2007 at 01:47 AM by mjerryfuerst
He's not interested in justice. He just is a good team player. Too bad his team is "my cronies" and not "the people of the U.S.A."...
Why does he hate America?
Oh, and the Dems are pinnacles of statesmanship? Please.
Let's not be so partisan about it... let's just discuss and fix why our choices are always so poor instead of scoring partisan points that really apply to both sides of the bickering.
--
j
Part-Time Pundit
Not surprising this is coming from Turley. Turley believes Bush is involved in a cover up of the Tillman case. Turley also believes that Cheney should have been indicted as a co-conspirator with Libby, and suggested nothing for Armitage who Fitzgerald found out was the source, not Libby, two days into the investigation, but mysteriously has not been charged. If Turley wasn't given to conspiracy theories then he would carry more weight outside of liberal politics, but he's a favorite of Olberman and lends his wild theories some gravity by having Turmey on his show.
i did not read it as a partisan article. I posted this so the valid concerns expressed in the article could be discussed. Both major parties are capable of the types of problems described.
Are you suggesting that the concerns in the article are not valid?
Michael Fuerst
If you consider the concerns expressed in the article invailid, please explain why.
Michael Fuerst
Yeah, who is Bambenek referring to--the article writer?
No one else mentioned partisan politics in the responses except himself.
Why is it that we can't discuss Republican missteps without someone accusing us of being partisan. This smacks of the type of schoolyard misdirection "he did it too!" that grade school kids use to justify their transgressions.